Stage 3 · Intermediate
Chaining & your own skills.
One job, three skills, back to back — on your own live document. Then the real unlock: you stop waiting for someone to build you a skill.
What today looks like
The 90 minutes.
Half of today you'll be working, not watching. There's no coffee break — the two hands-on blocks are the break.
Where you got to
Claude is now wired into your world.
- Connectors on: Drive, Gmail and Calendar can supply the real source.
- A Project has a real folder: the job and its outputs have a proper home.
- One topic, one chat: context stays clean and useful.
- Connectors off when unused: only bring in what the job needs.
- Load it once: the same files do not need feeding every morning.
01 / THE CHAIN
One job. Three skills. No re-typing.
The shape
The output of one is the input to the next.
Until now each skill was a one-shot: document in, deliverable out, done. Real work is not one-shot. A consultant report lands → you need to know what is wrong with it → somebody senior needs one page → the consultant needs a letter. Three skills, one document, and you never re-type a thing.
The chain is the lesson. The skills are just the excuse to show you the shape.
See the chain's outputsexamples ↗Link 1 · document-review
Start with what's wrong with it.
Say review this — anything off? A 60-page report goes in; red flags, gaps and questions come out. You already have this skill from stage 1.
Link 2 · executive-summary-report
Now make it one page for someone senior.
Same conversation. Say turn those findings into an ex summary for the board — no re-upload, no pasted findings, no context repeated.
This is why “one topic, one chat” matters. A new chat per step means re-feeding everything — slower, worse, and it costs you more.
Link 3 · formal-letters
And now put it on record.
Say draft a formal letter to the consultant on the three gaps — letterhead, reference number and a firm but measured tone.
Read it before you send it. Every time. Claude writes the letter; you are still the one whose name is on it.
The one thing to get right
Check the handover, not the output.
A chain fails at the joins, not in the middle. Before the next link, check the one thing it is about to build on: did the review actually find the issue you care about? If link 1 missed it, links 2 and 3 will confidently write about the wrong thing — beautifully.
Fixing the first link is a ten-second correction. Fixing the third one means redoing all three.
15 minutes · your real work
Your turn — and use something real.
Report, claim, submittal, proposal, scope of works — anything you must answer.
No document with you? Use Northgate from your pack. Use your own if you can — the point is that this works on your actual desk.
What just went wrong for someone here
Three ways a chain breaks.
New chat between steps
The context is gone. One topic, one chat.
Vague handover
“Summarise that” could mean the report or the findings. Name it.
Not reading link 1
The confident wrong answer, compounded three times.
Score the bidders, don't argue about them.
Say score these proposals. A compliance gate comes first: fail the mandatory gate and a bidder is excluded, not scored. Weighted eligibility, contractual, technical and completeness sections produce a ranked, defensible Word report with scope gaps and exclusions listed.
And this is a chain too.
Say now level the prices. commercial-evaluation picks up the scope gaps and exclusions proposal-review already found and adds them back into the pricing, so the comparison is like for like. Rate variances are flagged, bidders ranked, and the recommendation has a reason.
Technical first, then commercial — never the other way round. Price the scope you actually verified.
The two-minute version of a two-hour job
The org chart nobody wants to draw.
Say make an org chart for this project. Reporting lines, roles and names go in; a branded PowerPoint slide comes out. It is the smallest skill in today's pack and the one people use most — redrawing an org chart every time someone joins is exactly the task you named in stage 1.
02 / BUILD
Now stop waiting for someone to build you one.
Remember this?
You already named what to build.
In stage 1 you named three tasks that were repetitive, low-value and quietly annoying. That was not an icebreaker. One of those three is what you are building in the next 20 minutes.
What a skill actually is
A skill is a recipe you wrote once.
Not code. A skill is a folder with a plain-English file that says when to use it and how to do the job properly — the format, tone, sections and checks. You have used five since stage 1. skill-creator writes the sixth by interviewing you.
It is already in Cowork. Nothing to install — this one is a use, not a download.
The good candidate is a task you do the same way every time. Something you do differently each time is not a skill; it is a conversation.
skill-creator · driven
Watch one get built.
Say build me a skill that… It asks about the job, the output and what “good” means. Answer in plain English, run it on a real example, then correct it.
20 minutes · and you leave with it
Build yours.
Do not try to sound technical.
Do that twice.
Twenty minutes gets you a working first version, not a perfect one. The second pass matters more than the first.
Show and tell
Run yours on the screen.
Two or three people. Sixty seconds each. Say the trigger; show what came out.
What you unlocked
Your toolkit just became yours.
Take it with you
Scan, and see you at stage 4.
One code. If you have been before, it knows you — your pack opens with stage three already unlocked. First time on this phone, it asks you once.
Get your pack
Deck, skills zip, and everything from stages one and two.
training.stuartdigital.io/p3
Add me to your contacts
Questions any time.
training.stuartdigital.io/card